Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #260 on: June 26, 2012, 09:52:33 AM
|
TobyGadd
Posts: 1123
|
 |
« Reply #260 on: June 26, 2012, 09:52:33 AM » |
|
Anyway, if trail closures/re-routes do occur, how is made known to the riders? Since a few of us are planning on leaving on Saturday, 2 days b/f the GD, we may run into issues before the group (or at least until they catch up/pass me!). We may be the scouting/test group/guinea pigs!
I'm planning on calling the Colorado Trail Foundation before I take off. The should have a pretty good idea whether there's any work happening on the trail, or if any fires are likely to pose a threat. After that, I hope that the FS posts notices at trailheads, etc. I'm most worried about running into an active fire, so I'll be riding with a Spot for sure!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #261 on: June 26, 2012, 10:31:53 AM
|
Stefan_G
Posts: 335
|
 |
« Reply #261 on: June 26, 2012, 10:31:53 AM » |
|
It is up to every individual rider to be aware of any fires or trail closures that may exist, and (of course) obey the law with respect to any closures. I can't stress enough that you are all responsible for your own safety out there!!!
If you have to detour, use your best judgment about how and where to regain the CT further along the course. Any detour due to a trail closure is de facto the new CTR course.
I know it sounds preachy and I say it over and over, but the CTR is integrally dependent on each racer's decisions and actions. Imagine everyone in the race (and on the trail, and then another 1000 people just for kicks) making the exact same decision. If there is any doubt in your mind after considering that, maybe it's not the right choice...
And no matter what - enjoy the adventure!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.” -- frequently (mis)attributed to Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #262 on: June 26, 2012, 10:57:03 AM
|
TruthRider
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 55
|
 |
« Reply #262 on: June 26, 2012, 10:57:03 AM » |
|
The fire, smoke and trail closures here in Ft Collins have made training very difficult.
I live in Boulder and the smoke has been brutal. The worst thing is you can't even see it much, but riding this am (pre-sunrise to beat the heat, although it was 84 at 5:20) my throat was burning by the end. If you live on the Front Range, go out at night with a flashlight and point it up. Be prepared to be bummed out at the amazing content of ash in the air that you can't see in the day time. Nasty.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #263 on: June 26, 2012, 05:11:02 PM
|
Juan Speeder
Posts: 8
|
 |
« Reply #263 on: June 26, 2012, 05:11:02 PM » |
|
One more thing to add to the gear list.  Sigh...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #264 on: June 27, 2012, 06:08:15 AM
|
Yogi the Barry
Location: Land of Detachment
Posts: 86
|
 |
« Reply #264 on: June 27, 2012, 06:08:15 AM » |
|
I like the dust mask... at least it doesn't weight much!  Now I have two weather scenarios to worry about, full flow monsoon [my biggest worry, because I hate rain/mud/skeeters] or fire closures/reroutes. However, would be really nice if monsoon plume got tapped a bit before the end of July. If anybody is interested in joining us next July 4-6: July 4th - Monarch Crest/Rainbow Trail - relatively large coed group ride of mixed abilities. July 5th - CT segments 13 and 14. Smaller and faster group. July 6h - Kenosha Pass to Copper - CT S6 & S7. Just me, only person training for CTR, so far... -B
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #265 on: June 27, 2012, 06:49:36 AM
|
anth
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 27
|
 |
« Reply #265 on: June 27, 2012, 06:49:36 AM » |
|
At this point, with the fires and low snow/creek flows, I wouldn't mind being on the wet side! Maybe I'll regret saying that in 5 weeks......
Would love to join you guys but will actually be up in Crested Butte getting some training in myself as well. Enjoy!
Cheers anthony
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #266 on: June 27, 2012, 07:40:56 AM
|
boatmana
Location: Lake Havasu City, AZ where everything is hot and sharp
Posts: 19
|
 |
« Reply #266 on: June 27, 2012, 07:40:56 AM » |
|
Looking for help with shuttle from Denver on the 29th to race start and also are there any shuttles back to Denver post race going on?
Thanks peeps.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #267 on: June 27, 2012, 12:34:02 PM
|
Flounder
Posts: 76
|
 |
« Reply #267 on: June 27, 2012, 12:34:02 PM » |
|
Any of you Durango riders have any information on the fire currently going at the base of Junction Creek? I guess it's actually at Lightner creek.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #268 on: June 27, 2012, 12:36:29 PM
|
Yogi the Barry
Location: Land of Detachment
Posts: 86
|
 |
« Reply #268 on: June 27, 2012, 12:36:29 PM » |
|
http://www.inciweb.org/state/6/Any of you Durango riders have any information on the fire currently going at the base of Junction Creek? I guess it's actually at Lightner creek.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #269 on: June 27, 2012, 12:53:29 PM
|
joeydurango
Posts: 268
|
 |
« Reply #269 on: June 27, 2012, 12:53:29 PM » |
|
Yeah, it sucks. Lots of smoke visible from town. Lots of houses in that area, too... it seems silly to think about the trail when so many homes are at risk, but as far as that goes the fire is at best only 2-3 miles off the CT. We're getting ready to do the Durango Dirty Century a week from Saturday, which uses the CT from Bolam Pass back to town, and I'll let you all know if there's trouble.
If they don't get that fire out quick the lower section of the CT will be scorched, along with Hoffheins and Dry Fork, two sweet trails.
Dry lightning storm sparked at least four new fires last night in the immediate area. Hoping like hell the next storm actually brings rain.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #270 on: June 27, 2012, 02:49:28 PM
|
Flounder
Posts: 76
|
 |
« Reply #270 on: June 27, 2012, 02:49:28 PM » |
|
Joey, thank you for reminding me of how many homes are in that area. I don't know that area as well as some and to hear many homes are in harm's way is really disheartening. We've got lots of clouds overhead here in northern AZ, so let's hope it drops rain in Durango and Mancos...and CoSprings.
Sending you good vibes in Colorado.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #271 on: June 28, 2012, 05:34:26 AM
|
riverfever
Location: Woodland Park, Colorado
Posts: 245
|
 |
« Reply #271 on: June 28, 2012, 05:34:26 AM » |
|
The fires are simply unreal this year. My wife and I were evacuated yesterday from Woodland Park. I don't think I have lost my home but having a helluva time finding out information.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #272 on: June 28, 2012, 06:37:16 AM
|
Woodland
Location: Bailey, CO
Posts: 99
|
 |
« Reply #272 on: June 28, 2012, 06:37:16 AM » |
|
The fires are simply unreal this year. My wife and I were evacuated yesterday from Woodland Park. I don't think I have lost my home but having a helluva time finding out information.
Hope you can return soon Riverfever. It's tense in the foothills. I feel for all the folks losing homes. Unbelievable images coming out of CO springs this morning... Hey maybe all this smoke will make for some good sunsets on the trail! Just trying to find a few positives... Here's a gear question: I bought a new Fenix light and did an overnight ride on Mon/Tues and found out somewhat surprisingly that the light on high power only last 1.5 hrs. It's a great little light, but man that is a lot of batteries if I'm going to be riding some at night and early morning. I have a Princeton Tec EOS as well, which is a great little headlamp/bar light, but only 70 lumens. Any other strong lights (150 or more lumens) that have longer battery life out there and don't cost a fortune?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #273 on: June 28, 2012, 06:55:01 AM
|
TobyGadd
Posts: 1123
|
 |
« Reply #273 on: June 28, 2012, 06:55:01 AM » |
|
Any other strong lights (150 or more lumens) that have longer battery life out there and don't cost a fortune?
I've been using a Petzl MYO RXP with lithium batteries for a couple of years. It kicks out 160 lumens on high. I don't know how long it runs on high though, since I usually dial it back a lot on rides. It's programmable, so I run really dim settings whenever possible to save battery life. I also have a Planet Bike bar light, which isn't very bright, but runs for a long time. I run one or the other, sometimes both, depending on the terrain. I also have a Gemini Xera, which is stupid-bright--but it uses rechargeable batteries. It's great for faster overnighters like Kokopelli's Trail. Although it has huge batteries, they burn down too quickly on the higher settings for something as long as the CTR. I'm looking forward to the day that powerful lights like the Xera can be powered for multiple nights from a small energy pack. The truth is that you may not need very bright lights on the CTR. For me, it's often too technical to go fast at night, and I'm often too tired to ride really aggressively anyway (especially at night). Although I love brights lights, I was surprised how quickly I adapted to dimmer ones on the CTR.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #274 on: June 28, 2012, 07:07:40 AM
|
Woodland
Location: Bailey, CO
Posts: 99
|
 |
« Reply #274 on: June 28, 2012, 07:07:40 AM » |
|
The truth is that you may not need very bright lights on the CTR. For me, it's often too technical to go fast at night, and I'm often too tired to ride really aggressively anyway (especially at night). Although I love brights lights, I was surprised how quickly I adapted to dimmer ones on the CTR.
My over-nighter the other day had me on the Nate Stultz trail at night (anyone ever had the pleasure of riding that one!!) which is so overgrown and rough and full of dead-fall that I needed some strong lights. My light on the low setting lasts for like 40 hours...so maybe it is just about managing the settings.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #275 on: June 28, 2012, 07:30:38 AM
|
joeydurango
Posts: 268
|
 |
« Reply #275 on: June 28, 2012, 07:30:38 AM » |
|
I really like my CygoLite Mitycross 400 (which is now 480, not 400, lumens). Rechargeable batteries, yes, but very small and light. I brought three batteries on the CTR and rode a whole bunch at night. Programmable settings helped manage battery life, and with a combo of high for descending/techy, low for walking, and medium for just riding along, each battery lasted over eight hours. When I made it home after dark on the fifth day, my last battery had just an hour or so of juice left. Perfect!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #276 on: June 28, 2012, 07:37:15 AM
|
mtnbound
Posts: 102
|
 |
« Reply #276 on: June 28, 2012, 07:37:15 AM » |
|
I am also still debating lights but so far I am going with 2 BD Storms (helmet and on the handlebars). They put out 100 lumen each but good points are light (3.9 oz w/batteries), waterproof and only use 4AAA each, with 50 hour runtime on high (longer on lower settings). So, I am not planning on bringing any extra batteries and will avoid extra battery weight (but will change them in BV) since 50 hours is a long time and I think 2 100 lumen lights will work (if pointed in the same area, roughly it brings that area closer to 200 lumen). Not particularly bright but decent enough since I don't expect to be going that fast after a long day, but it depends on your riding style, how much you plan on riding in the dark each night and how much you want your lights and batteries to weigh. One weak point still working on is how to attach it tighter to the handlebar - it bounces around a bit on the techier stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #277 on: June 28, 2012, 07:46:05 AM
|
TobyGadd
Posts: 1123
|
 |
« Reply #277 on: June 28, 2012, 07:46:05 AM » |
|
I am also still debating lights but so far I am going with 2 BD Storms (helmet and on the handlebars). They put out 100 lumen each but good points are light (3.9 oz w/batteries), waterproof and only use 4AAA each, with 50 hour runtime on high (longer on lower settings).
Have you actually tested that 50-hour run-time on high? Backpacker Magazine says that it'll only run for four hours on high. http://www.backpacker.com/gear-review-black-diamond-storm/gear/15882
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #278 on: June 28, 2012, 08:34:08 AM
|
mtnbound
Posts: 102
|
 |
« Reply #278 on: June 28, 2012, 08:34:08 AM » |
|
Toby - thanks. I haven't tested their 50 hour runtime claim. I know most of these lights have overstated runtimes. I have a NR light and despite exchanging for two different ones, the runtimes were 20-25% lower than stated on their website. The Fenix LD20 I had had the same problem - runtime was about 20% less than stated.
I have used regular batteries and ran the Storm on high for about 10 hours before it started getting dimmer but I can't say how much dimmer (maybe a loss of 30+%) but it was noticeable. I am going to try it out with lithium batteries and see how long it lasts and how long before it gets noticeably dimmer (and compare dimmness to my other one that will remain fully charged). Hmm, maybe the 50 hours (more likely 40hrs) is b/f it runs all the way down.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 28, 2012, 09:02:09 AM by mtnbound »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: CTR 2012 Planning
|
Reply #279 on: June 28, 2012, 12:07:44 PM
|
TobyGadd
Posts: 1123
|
 |
« Reply #279 on: June 28, 2012, 12:07:44 PM » |
|
Toby - thanks. I haven't tested their 50 hour runtime claim. I know most of these lights have overstated runtimes. I have a NR light and despite exchanging for two different ones, the runtimes were 20-25% lower than stated on their website. The Fenix LD20 I had had the same problem - runtime was about 20% less than stated.
I have used regular batteries and ran the Storm on high for about 10 hours before it started getting dimmer but I can't say how much dimmer (maybe a loss of 30+%) but it was noticeable. I am going to try it out with lithium batteries and see how long it lasts and how long before it gets noticeably dimmer (and compare dimmness to my other one that will remain fully charged). Hmm, maybe the 50 hours (more likely 40hrs) is b/f it runs all the way down.
I'm going to check out this light some more. To be honest, getting 100 lumens out of a light for 40-50 HOURS seems too good to be true--especially since Backpacking Magazine posts very different numbers. But if I can verify that this is accurate, I'll be whipping out my credit card before the sun goes down. I just e-mailed Black Diamond, and I'll let you know what they say. Edit: I just checked the manual, and it has a "Distance with Fresh Batteries" chart. It seems to state that after 30 minutes, the light will drop from 70 meters of visibility to 57 meters. And then after 10 hours, it'll drop to 9 meters. Seems to contradict the other chart, which shows 70 meters for 50 hours. Damn, I'm confused...
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 28, 2012, 12:13:10 PM by TobyGadd »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|